https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66646
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Last reconfirmed|2015-06-2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66646
--- Comment #5 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
After commit reordering passes:
commit 410372fef14173261ce8e547db98eafb3174921f
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu May 19 07:39:52 2016 +
2016-05-19 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimizati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66646
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 20 Apr 2016, amker at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66646
>
> --- Comment #3 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> BTW, shall we version the loop in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66646
--- Comment #3 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
BTW, shall we version the loop in ldist pass if # of iterations can't be
computed at compilation time. We can check the target dependent value when
deciding which version should be executed. It do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66646
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66646
--- Comment #1 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
With Ofast optimization level.
