https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66502
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66502
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cd83fd98a7e769ac7ded28377984f68238812a26
commit r12-6182-gcd83fd98a7e769ac7ded28377984f68238812a26
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66502
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66502
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> SCCVN preference changed. Missed optimization remains (now the other
> variant).
GCC 10 looks like it can handle both now. I don't know if that means this can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66502
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
SCCVN preference changed. Missed optimization remains (now the other variant).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66502
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Aug 13 07:06:10 2015
New Revision: 226850
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226850&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-08-13 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/66502
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66502
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Someone craft a testcase where both cases are interconnected and thus no
optimization is performed currently with either scheme (but would with
merged SCCs).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66502
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
