https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65961
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65961
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jun 2 07:50:19 2015
New Revision: 224013
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224013&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-06-02 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/65961
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65961
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
It might be mitigated for the testcase in question but the underlying problem
didn't get fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65961
--- Comment #5 from David Binderman ---
As of trunk 20150520, this bug looks fixed to me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65961
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Hmpf, so we have an operand that is both part of a regular SLP node _and_ is
part
of a SLP node that gets its operand built up from scalars. So obviously
looking at STMT_VINFO_VECTORIZABLE (def-of-op) isn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65961
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65961
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65961
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|