http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59892
--- Comment #5 from Lukasz Dorau ---
I see. Now I understand. Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59892
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Lukasz Dorau from comment #3)
> (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #2)
> > When v.hosts[0] or v.hosts[1] is NULL the loop is fine, so there is
> > no reason for a warning.
> > The
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59892
--- Comment #3 from Lukasz Dorau ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #2)
> When v.hosts[0] or v.hosts[1] is NULL the loop is fine, so there is
> no reason for a warning.
> The testcase is obviously invalid.
>
But v.hosts[0] and v.hos
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59892
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59892
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
The warning should be there already.
