subject:"\[Bug tree\-optimization\/58088\] \[4.8\/4.9 Regression\] ICE in gcc.c"

[Bug tree-optimization/58088] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in gcc.c

2013-10-04 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58088 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added CC||heiko.abraham@hella-gutmann

[Bug tree-optimization/58088] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in gcc.c

2013-09-17 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58088 --- Comment #11 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Tue Sep 17 13:59:42 2013 New Revision: 202653 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202653&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [gcc/] 2013-09-17 Kyrylo Tkachov PR tree-optimizati

[Bug tree-optimization/58088] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in gcc.c

2013-09-17 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58088 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/58088] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in gcc.c

2013-09-17 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58088 --- Comment #10 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Tue Sep 17 13:29:41 2013 New Revision: 202652 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202652&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [gcc/] 2013-09-17 Kyrylo Tkachov PR tree-optimizati

[Bug tree-optimization/58088] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in gcc.c

2013-08-07 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58088 --- Comment #9 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Proposed patch posted at: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-08/msg00361.html

[Bug tree-optimization/58088] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in gcc.c

2013-08-06 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58088 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ktkachov at gcc dot g

[Bug tree-optimization/58088] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in gcc.c

2013-08-06 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58088 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek --- Kyrylo, do you plan to work on this? If that's the case, please assign the bug to yourself.

[Bug tree-optimization/58088] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in gcc.c

2013-08-06 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58088 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- Well, for (i * 2) & 128 the BIT_AND_EXPR case doesn't do anything, but then we get into BIT_IOR_EXPR case, here the "Canonicalize (X & C1) | C2." code changes that into (i * 2) & 255, then in BIT_AND_EXPR we d

[Bug tree-optimization/58088] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in gcc.c

2013-08-06 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58088 --- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #4) > Another testcases: > > int > bar (int i) > { > return 1 | ((i * 2) & 254); > } > > int > foo (int i) > { > return 1 | ((i * 2) & 255); > } This

[Bug tree-optimization/58088] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in gcc.c

2013-08-06 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58088 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Another testcases: int bar (int i) { return 1 | ((i * 2) & 254); } int foo (int i) { return 1 | ((i * 2) & 255); }