subject:"\[Bug tree\-optimization\/56273\] \[4.8 regression\] Bogus \-Warray\-bounds warning"

[Bug tree-optimization/56273] [4.8 regression] Bogus -Warray-bounds warning

2015-02-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56273 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/56273] [4.8 regression] Bogus -Warray-bounds warning

2015-02-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56273 --- Comment #24 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Feb 24 12:49:11 2015 New Revision: 220939 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220939&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-02-24 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2

[Bug tree-optimization/56273] [4.8 regression] Bogus -Warray-bounds warning

2013-03-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56273 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/56273] [4.8 regression] Bogus -Warray-bounds warning

2013-02-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56273 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED Version|unk

[Bug tree-optimization/56273] [4.8 regression] Bogus -Warray-bounds warning

2013-02-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56273 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener 2013-02-21 10:52:44 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Feb 21 10:52:39 2013 New Revision: 196200 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196200 Log: 2013-02-21 Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/56273] [4.8 regression] Bogus -Warray-bounds warning

2013-02-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56273 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski 2013-02-12 23:50:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > ../../../gcc-trunk/libgcc/crtstuff.c: In function 'frame_dummy': > ../../../gcc-trunk/libgcc/crtstuff.c:463:19: warning: array subscript is above >

[Bug tree-optimization/56273] [4.8 regression] Bogus -Warray-bounds warning

2013-02-12 Thread vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56273 --- Comment #9 from vincenzo Innocente 2013-02-12 16:24:11 UTC --- I am just rebuilding (Updated to revision 195983.) and noticed /home/data/newsoft/gcc-build/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/data/newsoft/gcc-build/./gcc/ -B/afs/cern.ch/user/i/innocent/

[Bug tree-optimization/56273] [4.8 regression] Bogus -Warray-bounds warning

2013-02-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56273 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener 2013-02-11 15:09:02 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Feb 11 15:08:51 2013 New Revision: 195942 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195942 Log: 2013-02-11 Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/56273] [4.8 regression] Bogus -Warray-bounds warning

2013-02-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56273 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/56273] [4.8 regression] Bogus -Warray-bounds warning

2013-02-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56273 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener 2013-02-11 13:33:29 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Feb 11 13:33:19 2013 New Revision: 195940 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195940 Log: 2013-02-11 Richard Biener P

[Bug tree-optimization/56273] [4.8 regression] Bogus -Warray-bounds warning

2013-02-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56273 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener 2013-02-11 10:52:39 UTC --- One of the reasons this all happens is of course that after complete unrolling we miss a pass that does full redundancy removal and const/copy propagation. For the latter we ab

[Bug tree-optimization/56273] [4.8 regression] Bogus -Warray-bounds warning

2013-02-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56273 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener 2013-02-11 09:32:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > The problem is a missing VRP. Basically ivopts changes: > if (j_10 != 9) > > Which works into: > > j_10 = ivtmp.12_56; > if (ivtmp.12_5