https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55860
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|law at redhat dot com |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55860
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Doesn't matter much to me either way. I review all the jump threading PRs
every release.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55860
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55860
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
BTW, I did look at walking up the CFG to discover edge equivalences we could
add to our tables. We don't have access to the path through the dominator tree
that we've followed, so I had to use a fairly conse
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55860
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
The other issue here is the loop header which looks like:
bb4:
# iii_16 = PHI
# jkl_17 = PHI
L1:
if (m_8(D) > iii_16)
goto ;
else
goto ;
[... ]
bb7
# iii_12 = PHI <0(6), iii_10(5)>
# jkl_4 = PHI
L2:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55860
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55860
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
