http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54505
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54505
--- Comment #4 from Avi Kivity 2012-09-09 11:12:53 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I don't think this transformation would always be an improvement.
gcc should make the transformation when it improves the code (like all other
transformations
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54505
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2012-09-06
19:25:29 UTC ---
I think this optimization is only a benefit when the following happens:
1) all functions will be inlined (not just a wrapper though).
2) the table is small
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54505
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|steven at gcc dot gnu.org |
--- Comment #2 from Steven Bosscher 2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54505
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
