https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54491
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Only foo is not optimized.
But bar is optimized to the same as baz.
I don't know if range and foo are equivalent due to wrapping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54491
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Sev
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54491
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2012-09-05
17:52:53 UTC ---
> integer overflow
Note there is never any integer overflow with unsigned types but always
wrapping.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54491
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54491
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-05
14:54:50 UTC ---
I'm suprised PR46309 doesn't handle this. Will look at it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54491
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status
