[Bug tree-optimization/51782] Missing address-space information leads to wrong code

2012-01-12 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51782 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mjambor at suse dot cz --- Comment #9

[Bug tree-optimization/51782] Missing address-space information leads to wrong code

2012-01-09 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51782 --- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-01-09 20:30:35 UTC --- It's scalar replacement of aggregates: With -O1 code is wrong. With -O1 -fno-tree-sra code is correct.

[Bug tree-optimization/51782] Missing address-space information leads to wrong code

2012-01-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51782 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-09 12:04:30 UTC --- Please figure out where the address-space information is lost.

[Bug tree-optimization/51782] Missing address-space information leads to wrong code

2012-01-07 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51782 --- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-01-07 12:17:21 UTC --- Created attachment 26267 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26267 a-bug.c.150r.expand a-bug.c.150r.expand RTL dump, FYI As you can see in read_rgb_ok that move in

[Bug tree-optimization/51782] Missing address-space information leads to wrong code

2012-01-07 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51782 --- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-01-07 12:11:50 UTC --- Created attachment 26266 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26266 a-bug.c.149t.optimized a-bug.c.149t.optimized tree dump, FYI

[Bug tree-optimization/51782] Missing address-space information leads to wrong code

2012-01-07 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51782 --- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-01-07 12:11:03 UTC --- Created attachment 26265 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26265 a-bug.c.004t.gimple a-bug.c.004t.gimple tree-dump, FYI

[Bug tree-optimization/51782] Missing address-space information leads to wrong code

2012-01-07 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51782 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-01-07 12:09:41 UTC --- Created attachment 26264 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26264 a-bug.c.003t.original a-bug.c.003t.original tree-dump, FYI

[Bug tree-optimization/51782] Missing address-space information leads to wrong code

2012-01-07 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51782 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-01-07 12:08:25 UTC --- Created attachment 26263 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26263 a-bug.s (assembler output) read_rgb_ok uses LPM instructions to read data (okay) read_rgb_bug use

[Bug tree-optimization/51782] Missing address-space information leads to wrong code

2012-01-07 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51782 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-01-07 12:05:20 UTC --- Created attachment 26262 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26262 a-bug.c C source file triggering the bug.

[Bug tree-optimization/51782] Missing address-space information leads to wrong code

2012-01-07 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51782 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|