http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51481
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-12-13
14:01:04 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 13 14:00:58 2011
New Revision: 182284
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182284
Log:
Revert
2011-12-12 Jakub Jelinek
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51481
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-13
12:56:13 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Dec 13 12:56:09 2011
New Revision: 182280
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182280
Log:
2011-12-13 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51481
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-13
11:24:44 UTC ---
The following is a real fix I'm going to test.
@@ -1601,6 +1605,7 @@ replace_uses_by (tree name, tree val)
if (gimple_code (stmt) != GIMPLE_PHI)
{
gimple_s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51481
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51481
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-12-12
20:59:31 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 12 20:59:28 2011
New Revision: 182264
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182264
Log:
PR tree-optimization/51481
* gimple-fold.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51481
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26053|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51481
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51481
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51481
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51481
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
10 matches
Mail list logo