[Bug tree-optimization/47407] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr42585.c FAILs on Tru64 UNIX V5.1B

2011-07-29 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47407 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED URL|

[Bug tree-optimization/47407] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr42585.c FAILs on Tru64 UNIX V5.1B

2011-07-29 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47407 --- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth 2011-07-29 09:29:14 UTC --- Author: ro Date: Fri Jul 29 09:29:10 2011 New Revision: 176919 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176919 Log: PR tree-optimization/47407 * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr4

[Bug tree-optimization/47407] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr42585.c FAILs on Tru64 UNIX V5.1B

2011-07-27 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47407 --- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-07-27 16:24:19 UTC --- > --- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor 2011-07-27 > 14:18:12 UTC --- > Like for many other targets that skip this test, the value of > MOVE_RATIO of the target can s

[Bug tree-optimization/47407] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr42585.c FAILs on Tru64 UNIX V5.1B

2011-07-27 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47407 --- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor 2011-07-27 14:18:12 UTC --- Like for many other targets that skip this test, the value of MOVE_RATIO of the target can simply be too small for SRA to consider total scalarization profitable. With the current tru

[Bug tree-optimization/47407] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr42585.c FAILs on Tru64 UNIX V5.1B

2011-07-19 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47407 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|