[Bug tree-optimization/46639] [4.6 Regression] Missing optimization

2011-02-28 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46639 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka 2011-02-28 09:25:28 UTC --- There is no predictor predicting x > 1023 as unlikely, there is not much you can easilly guess here ;(

[Bug tree-optimization/46639] [4.6 Regression] Missing optimization

2011-02-27 Thread d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46639 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-02-27 19:56:55 UTC --- Still fails with GCC version 4.6.0 20110226.

[Bug tree-optimization/46639] [4.6 Regression] Missing optimization

2011-02-17 Thread d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46639 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-02-17 17:02:20 UTC --- I can't reproduce this bug now.

[Bug tree-optimization/46639] [4.6 Regression] Missing optimization

2011-01-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46639 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/46639] [4.6 Regression] Missing optimization

2010-11-24 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46639 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug tree-optimization/46639] [4.6 Regression] Missing optimization

2010-11-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46639 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|