http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46312
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46312
--- Comment #11 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-17 10:00:34 UTC ---
Author: irar
Date: Wed Nov 17 10:00:27 2010
New Revision: 166860
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166860
Log:
PR tree-optimization/46312
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46312
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-12
11:50:53 UTC ---
No, it isn't unfortunately fixed anywhere.
vect.exp unfortunately only puts the correct options as default options (if no
dg-options is provided).
I guess either the testcase should
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46312
--- Comment #9 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2010-11-12
10:51:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> So this gets fixed by moving the testcase to a different directory for x86_32
> ?
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-scal-opt.c scan-tree-dump-times veclow
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46312
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46312
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46312
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-09
13:45:54 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 9 13:45:45 2010
New Revision: 166489
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166489
Log:
2010-11-09 Richard Guenther
PR testsui
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46312
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46312
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de
2010-11-05 11:43:48 UTC ---
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46312
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46312
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2010-11-05
11:41:40 UTC ---
> --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-05
> 11:29:41 UTC ---
> Hm, of course. Does adding
>
> /* { dg-require-effective-target vect_shift } */
>
> make it unsupported
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46312
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46312
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
12 matches
Mail list logo