http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45902
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45902
--- Comment #14 from Sebastian Pop 2010-11-09
19:09:01 UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Nov 9 19:08:57 2010
New Revision: 166506
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166506
Log:
Fix PR45314: backport revision 163123.
2010-11-09
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45902
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45902
--- Comment #12 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02 12:13:01 UTC ---
Author: irar
Date: Tue Nov 2 12:12:56 2010
New Revision: 166175
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166175
Log:
PR tree-optimization/45902
* tree-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45902
--- Comment #11 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-11 12:18:57 UTC ---
Author: irar
Date: Mon Oct 11 12:18:47 2010
New Revision: 165302
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165302
Log:
PR tree-optimization/45902
* tree-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45902
--- Comment #10 from Ira Rosen 2010-10-10 15:06:37 UTC
---
It doesn't work for pointers (pr42709):
+int
+main1 (int *a, int *b, int *c, int *d, int dummy)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < N/2; i+=4)
+{
+ res[i] = a + 16;
+ res[i+1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45902
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-10
13:26:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> The problem is in creation of constant operands for SLP, and is caused by my
> patch r155882, which takes the type for the constant from the constant itse
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45902
--- Comment #8 from Ira Rosen 2010-10-10 12:47:47 UTC
---
The problem is in creation of constant operands for SLP, and is caused by my
patch r155882, which takes the type for the constant from the constant itself.
This was needed for pointers, bu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45902
--- Comment #7 from Ira Rosen 2010-10-10 08:58:32 UTC
---
I think I made a mistake. It doesn't make sense. I'll take another look.
Thanks,
Ira
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45902
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-08
09:44:04 UTC ---
+ if (CONVERT_EXPR_CODE_P (rhs_code)
+ && TREE_TYPE (lhs) != TREE_TYPE (first_stmt_lhs))
checking types_compatible_p (TREE_TYPE (lhs), TREE_TYPE (first_stmt_l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45902
Pat Haugen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2010-10-07 13:07
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45902
Pat Haugen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|UNCONFIRMED
Ever Confirmed|1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45902
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45902
--- Comment #3 from Pat Haugen 2010-10-06
02:29:35 UTC ---
Just checked current trunk, rev 165011, still fails. Started failing a while
ago actually, have it narrowed down to 159910(ok) - 159980(fail). Unfortunately
159920-159970 result in GCC b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45902
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45902
Pat Haugen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org,
16 matches
Mail list logo
