--- Comment #5 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-08 22:16 ---
Right then, sorry for the noise :-)
I hope someone will be kind enough to add those test cases to trunk, too...
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #4 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-08 22:14 ---
With -fmloat-abi=softfp, it looks to me like this is vectorized correctly on
trunk. It's a little unintuitive because it becomes a left vector shift by
"249" == -7.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-02-08 20:40 ---
Subject: Re: Missed vectorization on ARM NEON
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> > Try adding -mfloat-abi=softfp to make the compiler actually consider using
> > NEON (needed at least for
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-08 20:32 ---
> Try adding -mfloat-abi=softfp to make the compiler actually consider using
> NEON (needed at least for arm-eabi, I don't know about arm-elf).
I don't think that is needed any more since the addition of the hard fl
--- Comment #1 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-08 20:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=19822)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19822&action=view)
Extra vectorization tests
Try adding -mfloat-abi=softfp to make the compiler actually consider using
NEON (needed
