[Bug tree-optimization/40992] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] cunroll ignoring asm size

2009-10-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-05 00:57 --- Created an attachment (id=18705) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18705&action=view) Patch which should fix this -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40992

[Bug tree-optimization/40992] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] cunroll ignoring asm size

2009-10-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-05 00:56 --- size: 41 __asm__ __volatile__ Before: size: 1 __asm__ __volatile__ -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40992

[Bug tree-optimization/40992] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] cunroll ignoring asm size

2009-10-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-05 00:39 --- >No easy way out without pessimizing more legitimate uses of asms. Actually that is not true. asm_insn_count in final.c will be able to count the number of instructions that an inline-asm will be. This size count

[Bug tree-optimization/40992] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] cunroll ignoring asm size

2009-08-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Priority|P3 |P

[Bug tree-optimization/40992] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] cunroll ignoring asm size

2009-08-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.2/4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression]|[4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] |cunroll ignoring asm size