http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38072
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:12
---
GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:29
---
GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #15 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2009-07-14 19:51 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Bah. So this then becomes "it would be interesting to know what fixed this on
> the gimple-tuples-branch" ...
Revision 134191 fixed this on gimple-tuples-branch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/b
--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-11 15:40
---
Bah. So this then becomes "it would be interesting to know what fixed this on
the gimple-tuples-branch" ...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38072
--- Comment #13 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2009-07-11 15:34 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> would be interesting to know what fixed this on the trunk.
A binary search on trunk identified revision 138207 as the point that fixed
this ICE. That revision is a large merge from gimple-tup
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 12:18
---
would be interesting to know what fixed this on the trunk.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38072
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-31 00:08
---
Hm, we are remapping
iftmp.1_6 = (struct A[0:n.0 + -1] *) D.1755_5
where the variable array pointer type contains in TYPE_SIZE_UNIT n.0_3 * 4
and n.0_3 is on the free list.
I wonder how we end up with an SSA nam
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-30 22:20
---
*** Bug 39047 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-24 10:20 ---
GCC 4.3.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-28 18:50
---
Shorter testcase without templates:
==
inline void* operator new[](__SIZE_TYPE__, void* p) throw() { return p; }
struct A
{
A() {}
int i
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38072
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-19 22:57 ---
We are remapping
(gdb) up
#4 0x08330b6c in remap_type_1 (type=0xb7d835b0, id=0xbfbe96a4)
at /home/richard/src/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/tree-inline.c:403
403 walk_tree (&TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (new), copy_body_r, id, NU
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-10 23:57 ---
Confirmed, still fails today on 4.3 branch.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
14 matches
Mail list logo
