[Bug tree-optimization/36228] redundant runtime check while vectorizing

2008-05-16 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-16 16:46 --- Fixed. -- spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/36228] redundant runtime check while vectorizing

2008-05-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-15 22:01 --- operand_equal_p is reasonably cheap. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36228

[Bug tree-optimization/36228] redundant runtime check while vectorizing

2008-05-15 Thread sebpop at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from sebpop at gmail dot com 2008-05-15 21:55 --- Subject: Re: redundant runtime check while vectorizing Here is a patch for this: > a first data dependence test a call to operand_equal_p on the array references Tested with vect.exp and tree-ssa.exp. I will send another

[Bug tree-optimization/36228] redundant runtime check while vectorizing

2008-05-13 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-14 03:59 --- Subject: Re: redundant runtime check while vectorizing How costly would it be if we do as a first data dependence test a call to operand_equal_p on the array references? That certainly would avoid lot of computations

[Bug tree-optimization/36228] redundant runtime check while vectorizing

2008-05-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-13 13:40 --- I belive this is a known issue with the data-dependence analyzer? (I never understood why it doesn't recognize identical references...) -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed