[Bug tree-optimization/35642] heisenbug in tree vectorizer

2008-03-20 Thread bonzini at gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2008-03-20 14:07 --- Subject: Re: heisenbug in tree vectorizer > I would suggest that you go roll back to that release mentioned in > message 1, where you have exactly the same code base for bootstrapped > and non bootstrapped compiler and r

[Bug tree-optimization/35642] heisenbug in tree vectorizer

2008-03-20 Thread zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
--- Comment #8 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2008-03-20 13:59 --- Subject: Re: heisenbug in tree vectorizer bonzini at gnu dot org wrote: > --- Comment #7 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2008-03-20 13:51 --- > Indeed my patch exposes additional vectorization abilities (whi

[Bug tree-optimization/35642] heisenbug in tree vectorizer

2008-03-20 Thread bonzini at gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2008-03-20 13:51 --- Indeed my patch exposes additional vectorization abilities (which was unexpected). Kenny, can you run the failing testcase under valgrind? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35642

[Bug tree-optimization/35642] heisenbug in tree vectorizer

2008-03-20 Thread victork at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from victork at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-20 13:43 --- After some regression hunting, I see that failures of vectorizer testcases started after this patch: r133144 | bonzini | 2008-03-12 17:33:45 +0

[Bug tree-optimization/35642] heisenbug in tree vectorizer

2008-03-20 Thread victork at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from victork at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-20 09:42 --- I see same failures using compiler boostrapped with vectorization enabled using BOOT_CFLAGS="-g -O2 -ftree-vectorize -maltivec -mabi=altivec" Tests fail because some loops were not vectorized: home/victork/mainline/

[Bug tree-optimization/35642] heisenbug in tree vectorizer

2008-03-20 Thread irar at il dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #4 from irar at il dot ibm dot com 2008-03-20 09:30 --- I reproduced the failures with revision 133362 (and without --disable-multilib). Reverting our patch (revision 133134) didn't help, I still see the failures even without it. Ira -- irar at il dot ibm dot com changed

[Bug tree-optimization/35642] heisenbug in tree vectorizer

2008-03-19 Thread zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
--- Comment #3 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2008-03-19 19:26 --- I forgot to mention that valgrind does not find anything. kenny -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35642

[Bug tree-optimization/35642] heisenbug in tree vectorizer

2008-03-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-19 19:17 --- I wonder if the following patch could have caused the use of a variable after a free: 2008-03-12 Victor Kaplansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> + Ira Rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> + + * tree-vectorizer.c (free_s

[Bug tree-optimization/35642] heisenbug in tree vectorizer

2008-03-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-19 19:15 --- On PowerPC-darwin, I started to get the following failures between LAST_UPDATED: Wed Mar 12 03:41:52 UTC 2008 (revision 133132) and LAST_UPDATED: Tue Mar 18 21:37:03 UTC 2008 (revision 133327) +FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/v