[Bug tree-optimization/34385] [4.3 Regression] new miscompilation after PR34148 fix

2008-12-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-04 16:34 --- Note that the trunk still doesn't warn because we transform the invalid access to a valid one by doing node.11_19 = (struct Node *) D.2454_18; D.2456.i = node.11_19; D.2457_20 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(D.2456).i; i

[Bug tree-optimization/34385] [4.3 Regression] new miscompilation after PR34148 fix

2007-12-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-08 00:03 --- Because the temporary object D.2360 is indeed artificial. If you disable that filtering you get (finally) t.ii: In function 'const QString& staticQString(const QString&)': t.ii:110: warning: likely type-punning may

[Bug tree-optimization/34385] [4.3 Regression] new miscompilation after PR34148 fix

2007-12-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-07 23:57 --- First we hit /* XXX: don't get into structures for now. It brings much complication and little benefit. */ if (struct_class_union_p (ptr_type) || struct_class_union_p (alias_type))

[Bug tree-optimization/34385] [4.3 Regression] new miscompilation after PR34148 fix

2007-12-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-07 23:47 --- We don't warn with -Wstrict-aliasing=3 first because we prune the points-to sets based on TBAA which makes o.11_19 in o.11_19 = (const struct const_iterator *) &D.2360; # VUSE D.2362_20 = o.11_19->i; point t

[Bug tree-optimization/34385] [4.3 Regression] new miscompilation after PR34148 fix

2007-12-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-07 23:14 --- Right, that is invalid. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 21920 *** -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/34385] [4.3 Regression] new miscompilation after PR34148 fix

2007-12-07 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-07 22:52 --- This code does not look defined: i = reinterpret_cast < const const_iterator & >(o).i; Where o is iterator&. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34385

[Bug tree-optimization/34385] [4.3 Regression] new miscompilation after PR34148 fix

2007-12-07 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|new miscompilation after|[4.3 Regression] new |PR34148 fix |