--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-30 09:30 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-30 09:28 ---
Subject: Bug 32527
Author: pinskia
Date: Mon Jul 30 09:28:14 2007
New Revision: 127058
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127058
Log:
2007-07-30 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR tr
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-25 16:56 ---
*** Bug 32892 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32527
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-02 23:59 ---
*** Bug 32417 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #5 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2007-06-29 19:29 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] ICE in build2_stat,
at tree.c:3074
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-29 19:27
> ---
> Mark,
> Even though th
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-29 19:27 ---
Mark,
Even though this has only showed up in Fortran code correctly. I could make
a C testcase where it fails. The Fortran code looks simplier because of arrays
in Fortran are way simplier than in C.
Do you want
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32527
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-29 03:23 ---
Testing a patch for this right now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32527
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-27 21:07 ---
#0 internal_error (gmsgid=0x8757d7f "in %s, at %s:%d") at
/home/apinski/src/gcc-fsf/work/gcc/gcc/diagnostic.c:596
#1 0x0816ae5f in fancy_abort (file=Could not find the frame base for
"fancy_abort".
) at /home/apins
