[Bug tree-optimization/31079] 300% difference between ifort/gfortran

2008-01-07 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #4 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2008-01-07 22:00 --- timings have improved a lot with a recent gfortran, at least on an opteron, I have now for ifort 3.7s for gfortran 4.5s (20% slower only) for the following code: SUBROUTINE collocate_core_2_2_0_0(jg,cmax) IMPLICIT N

[Bug tree-optimization/31079] 300% difference between ifort/gfortran

2007-06-20 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #3 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2007-06-21 04:16 --- (In reply to comment #2) > I see a smaller difference, but a difference nonetheless. yes, looks like better code is now generated, current timings are down to a 200% difference ifort: 1.988124 gfortran: 3.900243 --

[Bug tree-optimization/31079] 300% difference between ifort/gfortran

2007-06-20 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-20 20:59 --- I see a smaller difference, but a difference nonetheless. -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug tree-optimization/31079] 300% difference between ifort/gfortran

2007-03-08 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #1 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2007-03-08 11:11 --- The following is (for me) an even more interesting example, as it times only the loop that thus the actual multiply / add but also tricks my version of ifort into generating the expected asm. Ifort is about twice as fast