[Bug tree-optimization/30735] 50% slow down due to mem-ssa merge

2007-02-15 Thread pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #5 from pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com 2007-02-15 23:36 --- Seeing similar behavior on PPC for CPU2000. Comparing revisions 119759 and 119760, 179.art degrades 24% and 200.sixtrack degrades 50%. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30735

[Bug tree-optimization/30735] 50% slow down due to mem-ssa merge

2007-02-12 Thread dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-13 00:59 --- I have now reproduced this locally and I'm working on a fix. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30735

[Bug tree-optimization/30735] 50% slow down due to mem-ssa merge

2007-02-08 Thread dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org

[Bug tree-optimization/30735] 50% slow down due to mem-ssa merge

2007-02-08 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Comment #3 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-02-08 17:13 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Try one of the partitioning patches I proposed. > Which one? Please provide a link or attach it here. Thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30735

[Bug tree-optimization/30735] 50% slow down due to mem-ssa merge

2007-02-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-08 17:07 --- Try one of the partitioning patches I proposed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30735

[Bug tree-optimization/30735] 50% slow down due to mem-ssa merge

2007-02-08 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Comment #1 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-02-08 17:01 --- Created an attachment (id=13021) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13021&action=view) A testcase # /usr/gcc-good/bin/gfortran -v Using built-in specs. Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: /net/gnu-13/e