--- Comment #12 from dorit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-01 08:35 ---
A fix was committed, looks like the patch can be closed.
--
dorit at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #11 from irar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-12 06:56 ---
Subject: Bug 29925
Author: irar
Date: Mon Mar 12 06:56:41 2007
New Revision: 122833
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122833
Log:
PR tree-optimization/29925
* tree-data-ref.c (anal
--- Comment #10 from irar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-11 13:47 ---
Subject: Bug 29925
Author: irar
Date: Sun Mar 11 13:47:40 2007
New Revision: 122819
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122819
Log:
PR tree-optimization/29925
* tree-data-ref.c (anal
--- Comment #9 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-03-05 08:01 ---
Subject: Bug number PR tree-optimization/29925
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg00254.html
--
http://gcc.
--- Comment #8 from jean-marc dot valin at usherbrooke dot ca 2006-12-30
06:42 ---
Shouldn't the priority of this bug be increased considering that it produces
wrong code on valid input and the affected package (Speex) is included in most
Linux distributions (fortunately most of these d
--- Comment #7 from jean-marc dot valin at usherbrooke dot ca 2006-12-14
13:28 ---
Could be x86-64 only, I don't know. I don't have a plain x86 with gcc 4.1 to
test on.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29925
--- Comment #6 from irar at il dot ibm dot com 2006-12-14 12:41 ---
I couldn't reproduce the problem on x86. I ran it with valgrind
--leak-check=yes, is it correct?
Ira
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29925
