--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-11 01:07 ---
Oh, this is a dup of bug 23086.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 23086 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-25 05:30 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > What is interesting is that ICC does not even do this optimization.
>
> Even LLVM does this optimization, I am starting to think ICC is not really a
> good com
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-25 05:04 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> What is interesting is that ICC does not even do this optimization.
Even LLVM does this optimization, I am starting to think ICC is not really a
good compiler.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/b
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-25 04:56 ---
What is interesting is that ICC does not even do this optimization.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25558
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25558
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-25 04:19 ---
CSE is the one which does this on the rtl level.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-25 04:16 ---
Woops I had messed up the testcase, anyways the following line:
if (b == 2)
Should be replaced with:
if (b != 2)
This is already done on the RTL level.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
