[Bug tree-optimization/2462] "restrict" implementation bug

2010-07-13 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-13 11:28 --- We have a separate bug for malloced memory. So this bug is FIXED. -- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/2462] "restrict" implementation bug

2010-07-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-13 11:12 --- (In reply to comment #9) > Restrict has been implemented anew for GCC 4.6. Does that fix this bug? In 4.5, see comment #7 for the status of this bug. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2462

[Bug tree-optimization/2462] "restrict" implementation bug

2010-07-13 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-13 10:48 --- Restrict has been implemented anew for GCC 4.6. Does that fix this bug? -- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug tree-optimization/2462] "restrict" implementation bug

2009-06-25 Thread dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
--- Comment #8 from dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu 2009-06-25 15:31 --- (In reply to comment #7) > With the new restrict implementation baz() works and all the rest would work > as well if the calls to link_error () would not cause the malloced memory > to be clobbered. The a

[Bug tree-optimization/2462] "restrict" implementation bug

2009-06-25 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-25 10:28 --- With the new restrict implementation baz() works and all the rest would work as well if the calls to link_error () would not cause the malloced memory to be clobbered. The artifact here is that malloced memory is co

[Bug tree-optimization/2462] "restrict" implementation bug

2009-06-25 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-06-25 08:58 --- Oops... -- ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/2462] "restrict" implementation bug

2007-05-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-22 02:09 --- pointer plus branch helps out with the heap allocated memory, may_alias gets less confused with them. It does not fully fix this bug but it does help out. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2462