[Bug tree-optimization/23153] [4.1 Regression] code size regression from 4.0 on x86

2005-08-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||23488 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153

[Bug tree-optimization/23153] [4.1 Regression] code size regression from 4.0 on x86

2005-08-19 Thread dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
--- Additional Comments From dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu 2005-08-19 21:47 --- Is there any reason that this PR is still in "UNCONFIRMED" state? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153

[Bug tree-optimization/23153] [4.1 Regression] code size regression from 4.0 on x86

2005-08-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 23153 depends on bug 23289, which changed state. Bug 23289 Summary: [4.1 Regression] tail call optimization not performed http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23289 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug tree-optimization/23153] [4.1 Regression] code size regression from 4.0 on x86

2005-08-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||23303 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153

[Bug tree-optimization/23153] [4.1 Regression] code size regression from 4.0 on x86

2005-08-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||23302 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153

[Bug tree-optimization/23153] [4.1 Regression] code size regression from 4.0 on x86

2005-08-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||23289 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153

[Bug tree-optimization/23153] [4.1 Regression] code size regression from 4.0 on x86

2005-08-01 Thread dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
--- Additional Comments From dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu 2005-08-01 20:43 --- -fno-tree-dominator-opts does not seem to have a great influence. textdata bss dec hex filename 181547 140526684 202283 3162b 4.1-nodopts-O2-i386/xterm 195088 1405

[Bug tree-optimization/23153] [4.1 Regression] code size regression from 4.0 on x86

2005-08-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-01 18:57 --- (In reply to comment #2) > I am not sure what you are asking. Aren't tree-dominator-opts enabled by > default > at -O2? I had meant -fno-tree-dominator-opts. See PR 21883 for an example where DOM causes

[Bug tree-optimization/23153] [4.1 Regression] code size regression from 4.0 on x86

2005-08-01 Thread dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
--- Additional Comments From dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu 2005-08-01 18:51 --- (In reply to comment #1) > This could be many things, first we don't care about code size for -O2. > > Second this is most likely jump threading. > > Can you add -ftree-dominator-opts and see wha

[Bug tree-optimization/23153] [4.1 Regression] code size regression from 4.0 on x86

2005-08-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|tree-optimization http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153