--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-18
13:55 ---
I don't know how this was changed to waiting.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAIT
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-18
13:51 ---
This was not fixed by the patch for PR 21574.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-15
14:15 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Hmm, can someone explain where in store_ccp we stuff constants
> into the mem_ref field of lattice values? There are a few places
> where simple_cst_equal is used to compare a
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-13
10:30 ---
Hmm, can someone explain where in store_ccp we stuff constants
into the mem_ref field of lattice values? There are a few places
where simple_cst_equal is used to compare a constant to mem_ref
but AFAICT m
--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-27
16:04 ---
store CCP returns UNKNOWN_VAL as soon as it sees the TMT, even though the RHS is
completely constant, and even after we set the value of the TMT's to constant.
Even if you change the call to link_error to a
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-27
15:56 ---
Confirmed. A weird case but still should be able to optimizated very easily.
--
What|Removed |Added
-
