--- Additional Comments From zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2005-07-19
20:39 ---
While it is true that this problem will go away because I removed the pass,
there still seemed to be the feeling that the reason that this was iced was that
this was goofy gimple and that that goofy gimple
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-19
19:57 ---
Fixed removing promot-statics by:
2005-07-19 Danny Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Kenneth Zadeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Makefile.in: Removed tree-promote-statics.c
* tree-promote-sta
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||zadeck at naturalbridge dot
||com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu dot
||org, dnovillo at gcc dot gnu
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-17
19:18 ---
Forgot to say the ICE for this testcase is:
unhandled expression in get_expr_operands():
unit size
align 32 symtab 0 alias set 3
fields
SI file t.c line 3 size unit
--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-17
19:17 ---
Subject: Re: New: [4.1 Regression] ICE with
static promotion
On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 19:13 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> Compile the following valid C99 code at -O3 and we get an ICE
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22530
