[Bug tree-optimization/20542] [4.1 Regression] Bootstrap failure at -Os

2005-03-21 Thread dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-21 19:28 --- Fixed -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/20542] [4.1 Regression] Bootstrap failure at -Os

2005-03-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-21 19:27 --- Subject: Bug 20542 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-21 19:27:02 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog tree-flow-inline.h tree-flo

[Bug tree-optimization/20542] [4.1 Regression] Bootstrap failure at -Os

2005-03-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-20 16:50 --- Patch here: . -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/20542] [4.1 Regression] Bootstrap failure at -Os

2005-03-18 Thread dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-18 21:45 --- I'm testing a patch now -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu

[Bug tree-optimization/20542] [4.1 Regression] Bootstrap failure at -Os

2005-03-18 Thread dberlin at dberlin dot org
--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-18 21:33 --- Subject: Re: New: [4.1 Regression] Bootstrap failure at -Os On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 21:21 +, rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > Bootstrapping with BOOT_CFLAGS="-Os -g" fails when the stage2

[Bug tree-optimization/20542] [4.1 Regression] Bootstrap failure at -Os

2005-03-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot ||org, pinskia at gcc dot gnu

[Bug tree-optimization/20542] [4.1 Regression] Bootstrap failure at -Os

2005-03-18 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-18 21:24 --- *** Bug 20543 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20542