--- Comment #12 from brett dot albertson at stratech dot com 2006-12-14
12:55 ---
This testcase started failing for me as of last night on trunk.
1c1
< Test Run By root on Thu Dec 14 06:04:39 2006
---
> Test Run By root on Wed Dec 13 06:04:24 2006
cut for space saving .
3094
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19633
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-13
13:47 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> If the testcase now works on ppc-darwin (see comment #7), then
> yes.
Yes it does.
--
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at redhat dot com 2005-06-13 13:44
---
Subject: Re: local address incorrectly thought to escape
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 01:41:06PM -, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> Ping Diego, should this be closed??
>
If the testcase now works on p
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-13
13:41 ---
Ping Diego, should this be closed??
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19633
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-21
12:52 ---
Should this be closed?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19633
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-18
03:22 ---
Hmm, the testcase now fails on ppc-darwin.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19633
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01
20:30 ---
Subject: Bug 19633
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-01 20:30:08
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog tree-flow.h tree-ssa-alias.
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-30
20:50 ---
I still see "b" marked as "call clobbered":
struct S { int w, x, y, z; };
struct T { int r; struct S s; };
void bar(struct S, int);
void foo(int a, struct T b)
{
struct S *c = 0;
if (a)
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-27
04:58 ---
Fix: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg01969.html.
This does not completely get you the tail call you were looking for, but it does
address the address escaping problem. I would probably just
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-27
04:45 ---
Subject: Bug 19633
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-27 04:45:20
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog tree-outof-ssa.c tree-ssa-a
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-26
23:34 ---
Testing patch.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dnov
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-25
23:32 ---
;; Function foo (foo)
Visiting use-def links for 0B
Visiting use-def links for &bD.1128.sD.1123
foo: Total number of aliased vops: 0
Referenced variables in foo: 4
Variable: cD.1131, UID 0, struct
--
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||19616
nThis||
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
14 matches
Mail list logo
