https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18940
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18940
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|53947 |26731
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18940
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |NEW
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski -
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-23
03:08 ---
suspend this one as this is hard and most likely not going to happen.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-22
07:38 ---
I was able to work around the problem which my tree combiner causes by doing
what the old forward-
pro did which is only combine into a COND_EXPR if we used the SSA_NAME only
once in the COND_EXPR
or when
--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-12
04:59 ---
These are real regressions because we are losing information.
In particular, when you replace D1360 <= 0 with n <= 1, we no longer can
determine that D1360 is <= 1.
This would require a pretty powerful asse
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-11
18:52 ---
This problem causes the following "regressions" with my tree combiner:
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-58.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 1 loops 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-60.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 1 loop
