--- Comment #12 from pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-04 17:40 ---
Subject: Bug 18527
Author: pbrook
Date: Tue Apr 4 17:40:00 2006
New Revision: 112675
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112675
Log:
2006-04-04 Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Backport
--- Comment #11 from pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-02 13:19 ---
Subject: Bug 18527
Author: pbrook
Date: Sun Apr 2 13:19:15 2006
New Revision: 112622
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112622
Log:
2006-04-02 Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Backport
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-07 16:03
---
Fixed for 4.2.0.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Stat
--- Comment #9 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-06 20:23 ---
Subject: Bug 18527
Author: rakdver
Date: Fri Jan 6 20:22:56 2006
New Revision: 109427
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109427
Log:
PR tree-optimization/18527
* tree-ssa-loop-ni
--- Comment #8 from rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz
2006-01-04 20:55 ---
Subject: Re: cannot determine number of iterations for loops with <=
> Toon posted an updated patch here:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-01/msg00048.html
>
> (Toon, I had Andrew add you
--- Comment #7 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-04 20:32 ---
Toon posted an updated patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-01/msg00048.html
(Toon, I had Andrew add you to the CC list, because somehow I couldn't, and I
think dicussion of the patch should either take place
--- Comment #6 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-09 19:36 ---
With the recent changes to scev analysis that ensure that signed chrecs do not
wrap (assuming -fno-wrapv), it is fairly easy to get tree level # of iterations
analysis to use this fact, see the attached patch.
This
--- Comment #5 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-09 19:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=9948)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9948&action=view)
Patch for no-overflow analysis from signedness
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18527
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-20
17:51 ---
This is fixed with -funsafe-loop-optimizations but there are still some opions
needing if it should be
on by default at -O2/-O3 or not.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18527
--
Bug 18527 depends on bug 19210, which changed state.
Bug 19210 Summary: not using do-loop for some loops
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19210
What|Old Value |New Value
--- Additional Comments From irar at il dot ibm dot com 2005-03-09 06:56
---
New testcase added: vect-3.f90 (in autovect branch for now).
If this PR is solved, testcase vect-3.f90 will be vectorized.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18527
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
03:37 ---
Also related to PR 19210 where we don't use bdnz because we don't know if the
loop is finite.
--
What|Removed |Added
12 matches
Mail list logo