https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119876
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119876
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||16.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119876
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119876
Bug 119876 depends on bug 119920, which changed state.
Bug 119920 Summary: Missed vectorization for conditioned adds
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119920
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119876
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
Aha, I was looking into scalar-to-vector improvements promoting scalar integer
+ 1 to vector on AMD CPUs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119876
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka ---
I think I made the testcase while working on something else that I forgot,
sorry :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119876
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note the difference between what I get with PR 119920 and what LLVM produces is
due to the generation of `b[i] > 0 ? 1 : 2` for GCC; should we file this
seperately?
Jan where you did notice this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119876
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||119920
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119876
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |16.0
Target|
