subject:"\[Bug tree\-optimization\/110067\] \[14 Regression\] Wrong code on pixman\-0.42.2"

[Bug tree-optimization/110067] [14 Regression] Wrong code on pixman-0.42.2

2023-06-04 Thread crazylht at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110067 --- Comment #12 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #11) > (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #9) > > Fixed. > > OK to close? Yes.

[Bug tree-optimization/110067] [14 Regression] Wrong code on pixman-0.42.2

2023-06-03 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110067 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/110067] [14 Regression] Wrong code on pixman-0.42.2

2023-06-03 Thread slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110067 --- Comment #10 from Sergei Trofimovich --- Thank you! I confirm the fix also fixed complete pixman-0.42.2 test suite.

[Bug tree-optimization/110067] [14 Regression] Wrong code on pixman-0.42.2

2023-06-02 Thread crazylht at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110067 --- Comment #9 from Hongtao.liu --- Fixed.

[Bug tree-optimization/110067] [14 Regression] Wrong code on pixman-0.42.2

2023-06-02 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110067 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:57b30f0134d9b49f7707b0c2ded6fd7686a312c8 commit r14-1510-g57b30f0134d9b49f7707b0c2ded6fd7686a312c8 Author: liuhongt Date: Thu Jun

[Bug tree-optimization/110067] [14 Regression] Wrong code on pixman-0.42.2

2023-06-02 Thread crazylht at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110067 --- Comment #7 from Hongtao.liu --- A patch is posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-June/620324.html

[Bug tree-optimization/110067] [14 Regression] Wrong code on pixman-0.42.2

2023-06-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110067 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Priority|P3

[Bug tree-optimization/110067] [14 Regression] Wrong code on pixman-0.42.2

2023-06-01 Thread slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110067 --- Comment #6 from Sergei Trofimovich --- Adding configure flags for completeness (nothing special): > Configured with: configure flags: --prefix=/<>/gcc-14.0.0 --with-gmp-include=/<>/gmp-6.2.1-dev/include --with-gmp-lib=/<>/gmp-6.2.1/lib --w

[Bug tree-optimization/110067] [14 Regression] Wrong code on pixman-0.42.2

2023-05-31 Thread crazylht at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110067 --- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu --- For br64 = br; br64 = ((br64 << 16) & 0x00ffull) | (br64 & 0xff00ull); n->n is 0x300200. n->range is 32. n->type is uint64. Currently the code assumes n->range is same as TYPE P

[Bug tree-optimization/110067] [14 Regression] Wrong code on pixman-0.42.2

2023-05-31 Thread crazylht at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110067 --- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu --- For br64 = br; br64 = ((br64 << 16) & 0x00ffull) | (br64 & 0xff00ull); n->n is 0x300200. n->range is 32. n->type is uint64. Currently the code assumes n->range is same as TYPE P

[Bug tree-optimization/110067] [14 Regression] Wrong code on pixman-0.42.2

2023-05-31 Thread crazylht at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110067 --- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #2) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > > I am suspecting it was caused by r14-1402-gd8545fb2c71683f407bfd9670 . > > I did not bisect and tested only a