https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109025
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109025
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c1873079b05e399355eb79e4828ed9ba2d0c6968
commit r13-6503-gc1873079b05e399355eb79e4828ed9ba2d0c6968
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109025
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
This is a latent issue where we are mis-detecting a double reduction. Since
we've loosened constraint on nested cycle detection we failed to beef up
constraints we put on double reductions.
Testing a min
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109025
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109025
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenther at suse dot de
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109025
--- Comment #7 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #6)
> Range now seems to be g:d699d32f47833cfa .. g:3b54cc9d04c2efb2,
> with 52 commits in the range.
Now downto g:0cbb756fe9c8e13a .. g:7e3ce73849fef8b5, with 13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109025
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #5)
> (In reply to David Binderman from comment #4)
> > I will have a go at a bisection. 825 git commits in the range.
>
> Current range seems to be g:59ad8b684dd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109025
--- Comment #5 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #4)
> I will have a go at a bisection. 825 git commits in the range.
Current range seems to be g:59ad8b684dd67e17 .. g:1191a412bb17a734,
with 206 commits in the r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109025
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> Note using &, | or ^ causes the ICE. Using + or - or * does not.
Interesting.
> Here is more simplified testcase:
Thanks for that. I will have a go at a bis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109025
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note using &, | or ^ causes the ICE. Using + or - or * does not.
Here is more simplified testcase:
```
int func_4(int t, int b) {
for (int tt1 = 0; tt1 < 128 ; tt1 ++)
{
for (int tt = 0; tt < 128; t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109025
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-03-05
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109025
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski
12 matches
Mail list logo
