[Bug tree-optimization/108281] float value range estimation missing (vs. integer)

2023-01-09 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108281 --- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #3) > > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > > > GCC 13 got float range tracking but the description isn't cl

[Bug tree-optimization/108281] float value range estimation missing (vs. integer)

2023-01-09 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108281 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug tree-optimization/108281] float value range estimation missing (vs. integer)

2023-01-09 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108281 --- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > GCC 13 got float range tracking but the description isn't clear as what > transform you are looking after? It seems you are looking for ranges > of standard m

[Bug tree-optimization/108281] float value range estimation missing (vs. integer)

2023-01-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108281 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org Ve

[Bug tree-optimization/108281] float value range estimation missing (vs. integer)

2023-01-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108281 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Component|target