[Bug tree-optimization/1046] gcc less efficient than jdk for recursion with -finline-functions

--- Comment #18 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-26 13:43 --- This is indeed fixed AFAICT. -- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/1046] gcc less efficient than jdk for recursion with -finline-functions

--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-22 13:19 --- This looks fixed - we eliminate the tail recursion for Fib(n-1). /usr/bin/time /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-sun-1.5.0.11/jre/bin/java Fib 267914296 3.97user 0.02system 0:04.02elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresid

[Bug tree-optimization/1046] gcc less efficient than jdk for recursion with -finline-functions

--- Comment #16 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-11 16:50 --- Subject: Bug 1046 Author: hubicka Date: Thu Jan 11 16:50:32 2007 New Revision: 120681 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120681 Log: PR tree-optimization/1046 * tree-tailcall.c

[Bug tree-optimization/1046] gcc less efficient than jdk for recursion with -finline-functions

--- Comment #15 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-11 16:45 --- Subject: Bug 1046 Author: hubicka Date: Thu Jan 11 16:44:56 2007 New Revision: 120680 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120680 Log: PR tree-optimization/1046 * tree-tailcall.c

[Bug tree-optimization/1046] gcc less efficient than jdk for recursion!

--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-24 03:01 --- . -- What|Removed |Added Severity|enhancement |minor Versi

[Bug tree-optimization/1046] gcc less efficient than jdk for recursion!

--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-07-24 03:01 --- Subject: Re: gcc less efficient than jdk for recursion! "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-23 19:

[Bug tree-optimization/1046] gcc less efficient than jdk for recursion!

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-23 19:59 --- (In reply to comment #11) > Bug 22633 has been marked duplicate of this, but that is a bit of strech. If you had read comment #7 and #8, you will notice that this is the same bug and really still an enhan

[Bug tree-optimization/1046] gcc less efficient than jdk for recursion!

--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-23 19:50 --- Bug 22633 has been marked duplicate of this, but that is a bit of strech. However, the stituation has elvolved since 2.95.2 and GCC is now able to detected some forms ofrecursion as real loops. What this bug

[Bug tree-optimization/1046] gcc less efficient than jdk for recursion!

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-23 19:30 --- *** Bug 22633 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/1046] gcc less efficient than jdk for recursion!

-- What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot ||org Last reconfirmed|2005-01-05 0

[Bug tree-optimization/1046] gcc less efficient than jdk for recursion!

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-13 18:17 --- *** Bug 19939 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/1046] gcc less efficient than jdk for recursion!

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-08 10:14 --- Honza, this is one we should catch on the tree-profiling branch now. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1046