https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101801
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101801
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:19d1a529fa9f78e7ec7be38d423c90e00cec8f8c
commit r12-2832-g19d1a529fa9f78e7ec7be38d423c90e00cec8f8c
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101801
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101801
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f31da42e047e8018ca6ad9809273bc7efb6ffcaf
commit r12-2789-gf31da42e047e8018ca6ad9809273bc7efb6ffcaf
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101801
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #3)
> So maybe a less invasive fix would be to add && !VECTOR_BOOLEAN_TYPE_P
> to the condition. Still no objection to killing it off instead though.
Yeah, I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101801
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
So maybe a less invasive fix would be to add && !VECTOR_BOOLEAN_TYPE_P
to the condition. Still no objection to killing it off instead though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101801
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Never really looked at the SIMD-without-SIMD stuff.
When I first saw this, I was hoping you were suggesting
killing off the whole thing :-)
So no, no objection from me. It sounds like in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101801
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
