[Bug translation/90183] ambiguous diagnostics "only available with"

2022-03-08 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90183 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Also relevant for French: #: cp/error.c:4357 #, gcc-internal-format msgid "override controls (override/final) only available with %<-std=c++11%> or %<-std=gnu++11%>" msgstr "le contrĂ´le de la surcharge (ov

[Bug translation/90183] ambiguous diagnostics "only available with"

2021-10-27 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90183 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |trivial Blocks|

[Bug translation/90183] ambiguous diagnostics "only available with"

2021-04-03 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90183 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-04-03 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug translation/90183] ambiguous diagnostics "only available with"

2021-04-03 Thread roland.illig at gmx dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90183 --- Comment #3 from Roland Illig --- In the German translation of GCC I consistently use "available since".

[Bug translation/90183] ambiguous diagnostics "only available with"

2019-04-19 Thread roland.illig at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90183 --- Comment #2 from Roland Illig --- The same diagnostic also appears for %<-std=c++-17%> and several others, and these are in the past. Are the options from these standard only available in that particular version of the standard? I don't guess

[Bug translation/90183] ambiguous diagnostics "only available with"

2019-04-19 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90183 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Currently there's nothing later than c++2a so it's correct. To be future proof it could say "or later" but that's a bit misleading, as there is (currently) nothing later.