[Bug testsuite/96109] [11 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-47.c etc. FAIL

2024-07-18 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96109 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/96109] [11 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-47.c etc. FAIL

2024-03-11 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96109 --- Comment #18 from Rainer Orth --- SPARC testsuite failures fixed for GCC 14.0.1.

[Bug testsuite/96109] [11 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-47.c etc. FAIL

2024-03-11 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96109 --- Comment #17 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Rainer Orth : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:96b63fa255e343bb9b3e7f77302213a91ce96293 commit r14-9427-g96b63fa255e343bb9b3e7f77302213a91ce96293 Author: Rainer Orth Date: Mon M

[Bug testsuite/96109] [11 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-47.c etc. FAIL

2024-02-23 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96109 --- Comment #16 from Rainer Orth --- The two tests still/again? FAIL on 32 and 64-bit Solaris/SPARC. If I understand the dumps correctly /vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-47.c:9:21: note: ==> examining statement: _3 =

[Bug testsuite/96109] [11 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-47.c etc. FAIL

2024-02-23 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96109 --- Comment #15 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 57507 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57507&action=edit current sparc-sun-solaris2.11 dumps

[Bug testsuite/96109] [11 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-47.c etc. FAIL

2023-08-25 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96109 --- Comment #14 from David Binderman --- Sorry wrong bug report.

[Bug testsuite/96109] [11 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-47.c etc. FAIL

2023-08-25 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96109 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug testsuite/96109] [11 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-47.c etc. FAIL

2023-05-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96109 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|11.4|11.5 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug testsuite/96109] [11 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-47.c etc. FAIL

2022-04-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96109 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|11.3|11.4 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biene

[Bug testsuite/96109] [11 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-47.c etc. FAIL

2021-10-26 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96109 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12 Regression] |[11 Regression] |gcc.

[Bug testsuite/96109] [11 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-47.c etc. FAIL

2021-01-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96109 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- So the question is whether we can make vect_compute_data_ref_alignment vectype agnostic (to also fix the required same vectype for multi SLP nodes covering the same DRs) and instead make DR_MISALIGNMENT a fu

[Bug testsuite/96109] [11 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-47.c etc. FAIL

2021-01-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96109 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment