https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92391
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92391
--- Comment #13 from Joel Hutton ---
This appears to no longer be failing in the latest 'gcc-testresults' can this
be closed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92391
--- Comment #12 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue Nov 26 22:11:39 2019
New Revision: 278738
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278738&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Update vect_char_add target selector to use its own cac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92391
--- Comment #11 from Joel Hutton ---
I see, I think you're right. I was able to replicate the failure when running
the whole 'vect' testsuite. I tried the following change:
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
b/gcc/testsuite/lib/t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92391
--- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #9 from Joel Hutton ---
> Weird, I tested on gcc202.
[...]
> # of unsupported tests 2
I see the same when testing this single test individually. However,
within
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92391
--- Comment #9 from Joel Hutton ---
Weird, I tested on gcc202.
% uname -a
Linux gcc202 4.19.0-5-sparc64-smp #1 SMP Debian 4.19.37-6 (2019-07-18) sparc64
GNU/Linux
% cat gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum
Test run by joelh on Tue Nov 26 17:22:27 2019
Nat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92391
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #47187|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92391
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92391
--- Comment #6 from Joel Hutton ---
This should be fixed with Richard Sandifords changes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92391
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #4 from Joel Hutton ---
> Hi Rainer
>
> I set up an account with cfarm, and tested on gcc202, the test fails because
> on
> SPARC, no constructor is generated, the for wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92391
--- Comment #4 from Joel Hutton ---
Hi Rainer
I set up an account with cfarm, and tested on gcc202, the test fails because on
SPARC, no constructor is generated, the for whatever reason (see below) making
the test not really applicable. I sugge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92391
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #2 from Joel Hutton ---
> As this fails when it was introduced, and I don't have a SPARC machine to test
> on, I suggest making this XFAIL on sparc.
I'd rather avoid rando
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92391
--- Comment #2 from Joel Hutton ---
As this fails when it was introduced, and I don't have a SPARC machine to test
on, I suggest making this XFAIL on sparc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92391
--- Comment #1 from Joel Hutton ---
I'm looking into this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92391
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
15 matches
Mail list logo
