https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.1 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64-suse-linux|powerpc64-suse-linux,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693
--- Comment #7 from Ira Rosen 2011-12-29 07:37:53 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> > Yes, vector_sizes_32B_16B seems to be ok in that case.
> Other two tests (vect-multitypes-1.c and no-section-anchors-vect-69.c) look
> like having the same pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693
--- Comment #6 from Michael Zolotukhin
2011-12-28 16:19:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> > In vect-peel-3.c we actually assume that vector length is 16 byte. Here is
> > the
> > loop body:
> > suma += ia[i];
> > sumb += ib[i+5];
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693
--- Comment #5 from Ira Rosen 2011-12-28 13:11:53 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> In vect-peel-3.c we actually assume that vector length is 16 byte. Here is the
> loop body:
> suma += ia[i];
> sumb += ib[i+5];
> sumc += ic[i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693
--- Comment #4 from Michael Zolotukhin
2011-12-28 13:01:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> > I though that if {vect_aligned_arrays} isn't true, than arrays could
> > be aligned even after peeling - that's why I added such check.
>
> Sorry, I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693
--- Comment #3 from Michael Zolotukhin
2011-12-28 12:59:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 26195
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26195
AVX2 vect dump
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693
--- Comment #2 from Ira Rosen 2011-12-28 12:27:18 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I though that if {vect_aligned_arrays} isn't true, than arrays could
> be aligned even after peeling - that's why I added such check.
Sorry, I don't understand
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51693
--- Comment #1 from Michael Zolotukhin
2011-12-28 11:08:36 UTC ---
I though that if {vect_aligned_arrays} isn't true, than arrays could
be aligned even after peeling - that's why I added such check.
Unfortunately, I can't reproduce these fails, a
11 matches
Mail list logo
