--- Comment #10 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-17 10:47 ---
Fixed then.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-17 09:47 ---
Subject: Bug 45266
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Aug 17 09:47:44 2010
New Revision: 163297
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163297
Log:
2010-08-17 Richard Guenther
PR testsuite/45266
--- Comment #8 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2010-08-16 17:11 ---
! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "memcpy|ref-all.*ref-all" 2 "original" } }
worked for me on IA64 where we have 2 memcpys' in the output. Neither of my
suggestions from comment #7 worked. I don't know if this will w
--- Comment #7 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2010-08-13 22:39 ---
Does "memcpy|(ref-all.*ref-all)" need to be "(memcpy|(ref-all.*ref-all))" or
perhaps "(memcpy|ref-all.*ref-all)". Everyplace else I see a | in a scan
statement there are parentheses around the options.
--
sje at cup
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-13 12:35 ---
*** Bug 45275 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-12 18:16 ---
Pls don't change back bug attributes all the time...
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-12 15:50 ---
I see the fails, but the pattern should still match.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-12 15:46 ---
The pattern doesn't match even though I see two memcpy calls!?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
