--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-10 21:39 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRM
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-10 21:38 ---
Subject: Bug 44325
Author: rguenth
Date: Sat Jul 10 21:38:32 2010
New Revision: 162044
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162044
Log:
2010-07-10 Mikael Pettersson
PR testsuite/44325
--- Comment #4 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-07-10 21:10 ---
This is fixed on trunk since r161797. However, this is now a 4.5 regression.
A patch to backport the fix to 4.5 has been posted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-07/msg00877.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
--- Comment #3 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-07-10 10:30 ---
It now also fails with 4.5 branch on sparc64-linux, with identical
-fdump-tree-vect-details as for powerpc64. With 4.6 it fails on ARM with
identical reason since 20100529.
I'm thinking this hunk in the PR44284 fix is t
--- Comment #2 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-07-10 10:06 ---
This test now also fails with 4.5 branch on powerpc64. It's a recent
regression, introduced somewhere between 20100701 and 20100708.
The -fdump-tree-vect-details file shows:
> fgrep vectorized vect-109.c.110t.vect
vec
