[Bug testsuite/42997] [4.4 Regression] Backported tests fail with checking

2010-02-16 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-16 10:59 --- (In reply to comment #9) > Fixed. > Richard, With one thing and another this slipped my mind. Sorry Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42997

[Bug testsuite/42997] [4.4 Regression] Backported tests fail with checking

2010-02-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-16 10:39 --- Fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug testsuite/42997] [4.4 Regression] Backported tests fail with checking

2010-02-10 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-10 14:57 --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > (In reply to comment #1) > > > Which is a remainder that devs should enable checking when testing > > > patches for > > > branches ... > > > > > > > I am usi

[Bug testsuite/42997] [4.4 Regression] Backported tests fail with checking

2010-02-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-10 14:49 --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Which is a remainder that devs should enable checking when testing patches > > for > > branches ... > > > > I am using the same configuration for both trunk

[Bug testsuite/42997] [4.4 Regression] Backported tests fail with checking

2010-02-10 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-10 14:39 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Which is a remainder that devs should enable checking when testing patches for > branches ... > I am using the same configuration for both trunk and release branch: --enable-clocale=gnu

[Bug testsuite/42997] [4.4 Regression] Backported tests fail with checking

2010-02-10 Thread sezeroz at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from sezeroz at gmail dot com 2010-02-10 14:29 --- (In reply to comment #4) [...] > > > > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr42705.c -Os (test for excess errors) > > > > > > It passed for me on Linux/x86. > > > > > > > Fails for me both on i686- and x86_64-linux. > > > >

[Bug testsuite/42997] [4.4 Regression] Backported tests fail with checking

2010-02-10 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-10 14:09 --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr42705.c -O1 (internal compiler error) > > > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr42705.c -O1 (test for excess errors) > > > FAIL: g

[Bug testsuite/42997] [4.4 Regression] Backported tests fail with checking

2010-02-08 Thread sezeroz at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from sezeroz at gmail dot com 2010-02-08 21:18 --- (In reply to comment #2) > > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr42705.c -O1 (internal compiler error) > > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr42705.c -O1 (test for excess errors) > > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr42705.c -O2 (i

[Bug testsuite/42997] [4.4 Regression] Backported tests fail with checking

2010-02-08 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-02-08 13:51 --- (In reply to comment #0) > Running target unix/ > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr42632.c -O2 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr42632.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer (test for > exces > s errors)

[Bug testsuite/42997] [4.4 Regression] Backported tests fail with checking

2010-02-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-08 12:01 --- Which is a remainder that devs should enable checking when testing patches for branches ... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42997