[Bug testsuite/41701] scan-assembler-not has false positives

2011-12-08 Thread meissner at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41701 --- Comment #6 from Michael Meissner 2011-12-08 19:34:47 UTC --- On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 07:20:50PM +, gseanmcg at gmail dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41701 > > --- Comment #4 from Sean McGovern 2011-12-08 >

[Bug testsuite/41701] scan-assembler-not has false positives

2011-12-08 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41701 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug testsuite/41701] scan-assembler-not has false positives

2011-12-08 Thread gseanmcg at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41701 --- Comment #4 from Sean McGovern 2011-12-08 19:20:50 UTC --- Is this fixed now? If so, it can be closed.

[Bug testsuite/41701] scan-assembler-not has false positives

2010-01-29 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from meissner at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-29 17:54 --- Subject: Bug 41701 Author: meissner Date: Fri Jan 29 17:54:14 2010 New Revision: 156360 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156360 Log: PR 41701, prevent pow in compiler pathname from a false er

[Bug testsuite/41701] scan-assembler-not has false positives

2010-01-29 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from meissner at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-29 17:53 --- Subject: Bug 41701 Author: meissner Date: Fri Jan 29 17:53:46 2010 New Revision: 156359 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156359 Log: PR 41701, prevent pow in compiler pathname from a false er

[Bug testsuite/41701] scan-assembler-not has false positives

2010-01-26 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from meissner at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-26 23:46 --- Created an attachment (id=19720) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19720&action=view) Patch to fix my particular problem with builtins-58.c This patch fixes the particular problem I ran into that