--- Comment #11 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-01 14:37 ---
FIXED by Janis.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITI
--- Comment #10 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-16 20:01 ---
Subject: Bug 37960
Author: janis
Date: Mon Mar 16 20:01:15 2009
New Revision: 144892
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=144892
Log:
PR testsuite/37960
* gcc.dg/pr11492.c: Replace c
--- Comment #9 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-07 15:40 ---
Is this fixed? I think the solution was clear.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-10-31 04:26
---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Eric,
>
> Could you modify the testcase to use 100 instead of 1000 and run it under AVR?
>
The test is successful if the 1000 is changed to 100.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
--- Comment #7 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-30 21:17 ---
Eric,
Could you modify the testcase to use 100 instead of 1000 and run it under AVR?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37960
--- Comment #6 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-10-30 20:42
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> >
> > Note that AVR has 8-bit chars, 16-bit ints and pointers, 32-bit longs.
>
> Just a guess, given the above: for unsigned char b, b*1000 is signed int
--- Comment #5 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-30 20:27 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
>
> Note that AVR has 8-bit chars, 16-bit ints and pointers, 32-bit longs.
Just a guess, given the above: for unsigned char b, b*1000 is signed integer
and it may overflow, so probably this is
--- Comment #4 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-30 20:17 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
>
> I don't know if it is in the Compile Farm, or not. But I can test for you.
>
I need a way to debug this. I have no idea what the issue is.
> Note that AVR has 8-bit chars, 16-bit ints an
