--- Comment #15 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-27 05:46
---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #14 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-12 17:48 ---
Subject: Bug 37202
Author: janis
Date: Wed Nov 12 17:47:13 2008
New Revision: 141794
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141794
Log:
2008-11-12 Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR testsu
--- Comment #13 from mrs at apple dot com 2008-11-11 23:13 ---
The darwin patch is fine.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37202
--- Comment #12 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-11
15:33 ---
Posted patch to gcc-patches mailing list...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-11/msg00428.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37202
--- Comment #11 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-11-05 13:29 ---
Could somebody check if the following changes are OK?
diff -u ../_gcc_clean/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/visibility-14.c
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/visibility-14.c
--- ../_gcc_clean/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/visibility-14.c 2008-08-1
--- Comment #10 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-09-21
21:45 ---
Dominique,
Just post a proposed patch to gcc-patches that disables these tests and
cc the original author of the tests and one of the current Darwin maintainers
such as Mike Stump.
--
http://gc
--- Comment #9 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-09-21 19:37 ---
> As mentioned so many times. These testcases should be disabled for Darwin.
Then who is supposed to do it?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37202
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-09-21 19:15 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gcc.dg/visibility-1[4-9].c
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 21, 2008, at 12:11 PM, "dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #7 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot f
--- Comment #7 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-09-21 19:11 ---
On Darwin the patch refered to in comment #6 fixes the weak issues but not the
visibility failures.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37202
--- Comment #6 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-21 18:53 ---
> This is also failing on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu. It uses the define in
> elfos.h. assemble_external is not called. It looks like output_operand
> is wrong:
That rings a bell. I believe H-P's proposed patch fixe
--- Comment #5 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-21 18:31 ---
This is also failing on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu. It uses the define in
elfos.h. assemble_external is not called. It looks like output_operand
is wrong:
output_operand (rtx x, int code ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
{
if (x &
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-29 03:46 ---
For darwin, the testcase should not be run as darwin does not require
private_extern for hidden extern functions.
As for avr, the issue is most likely not using elfos.h or defining
ASM_OUTPUT_EXTERNAL as default_el
--- Comment #3 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-25 05:22
---
These tests have also failed on AVR recently. Known fail on revision 139139.
And no, this is not a duplicate of 37170, as the patch for that bug fixes those
test cases, but does not fix these.
--
eric do
--- Comment #2 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-08-22 16:17 ---
> This is a duplicate of 37170
I don't think so. Although I am bootstraping with the patch for 37170 and
cannot conclude yet, my previous attempt fixed the weak tests, but not the
visibility ones.
--
http://gcc.
--- Comment #1 from espindola at google dot com 2008-08-22 15:46 ---
Subject: Re: New: FAIL: gcc.dg/visibility-1[4-9].c
This is a duplicate of 37170
2008/8/22 dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On *-apple-darwin* the following tests introduced at revision 139100:
>
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
